HyperHost vs Contabo
Both appear in 2 sections: compute, footprint. Contabo is cheaper on 2 of 2 comparable measures.
Contabo is the better value at the sizes where both compete. Its Cloud VPS 4 is $6.60/month for 4 vCPU, 8 GB and 100 GB of SSD. The nearest HyperHost plan by memory is VPS Ultra at $37.17 for 4 vCPU, 7 GB and 120 GB, which is more than five times the price for slightly less RAM and 20 GB more disk. HyperHost is only competitive at the entry level, where VPS Mini at $3.84 for 1 vCPU, 1 GB and 10 GB undercuts anything in Contabo's published range. Above that, Contabo's memory-per-dollar is very hard to beat. Both are European: Contabo German with its own data centres and a long track record, HyperHost Ukrainian with locations in Ukraine and Europe. Contabo's known weaknesses are a setup fee on some billing terms and disk performance that varies under load, which is the usual consequence of selling memory this cheaply. HyperHost is smaller, lists only six plans, and quotes a biannual prepay rate about 24% below the monthly figure that Pikkly ranks on. If you need one small machine and want it in Ukraine, HyperHost's entry plan is a reasonable buy. For anything from 4 GB upwards, Contabo is the cheaper provider by a wide margin and the more established one.
Pikkly earns nothing from Contabo, and the ranking above is by price regardless.
Compute
All compute →Footprint
All footprint →| Metric | HyperHost | Contabo |
|---|---|---|
| Regionshigher is better | — | 77 countries |